PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XXXX vs. POCT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XXXXPOCT
YTD Return49.93%7.72%
Daily Std Dev159.99%4.65%
Max Drawdown-31.99%-18.80%
Current Drawdown-9.80%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XXXX and POCT is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XXXX vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 49.93% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 7.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
16.13%
4.24%
XXXX
POCT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XXXX vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for XXXX: current value at 2.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.95%
Expense ratio chart for POCT: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XXXX vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXXX
Sharpe ratio
No data
POCT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for POCT, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for POCT, currently valued at 4.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for POCT, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.72
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for POCT, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for POCT, currently valued at 25.90, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0025.90

XXXX vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

XXXX vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and POCT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-9.80%
0
XXXX
POCT

Volatility

XXXX vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT) at 0.39%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
15.80%
0.39%
XXXX
POCT