PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XXXX vs. QLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XXXX vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
31.50%
16.19%
XXXX
QLD

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 75.00% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 40.38% return.


XXXX

YTD

75.00%

1M

3.58%

6M

34.97%

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

QLD

YTD

40.38%

1M

2.83%

6M

18.39%

1Y

54.20%

5Y (annualized)

31.46%

10Y (annualized)

28.73%

Key characteristics


XXXXQLD
Daily Std Dev144.82%34.80%
Max Drawdown-31.99%-83.13%
Current Drawdown-4.38%-3.75%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XXXX vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for XXXX: current value at 2.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.95%
Expense ratio chart for QLD: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between XXXX and QLD is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XXXX vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
XXXX
QLD

Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

XXXX vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.27%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.90%0.11%0.19%0.13%

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.38%
-3.75%
XXXX
QLD

Volatility

XXXX vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 10.86%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.90%
10.86%
XXXX
QLD