FNGU vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGU returned 21.24% vs 117.40% for TNA. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.

Performance

FNGU vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 53.14% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: -3.67%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TNA

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 8.84%
• YTD: 53.14%
• 6M: 40.13%
• 1Y: 117.40%
• 3Y*: 25.74%
• 5Y*: -6.50%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	3.96%	3.02%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	53.14%	4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and TNA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.57

The correlation between FNGU and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGU vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGU	TNA
Technology	60.6%	16.9%
Communication Services	29.8%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	8.4%
Basic Materials	-	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Energy	-	6.2%
Financial Services	-	15.9%
Healthcare	-	16.5%
Industrials	-	17.5%
Real Estate	-	6.2%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 68
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGU	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.01	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	2.48	-1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.29	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	3.63	-3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	11.92	-11.06

FNGU vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-88.09%	+26.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-32.53%	-27.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-65.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.36%	-35.23%	+7.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-33.92%	+11.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.91%	9.91%	+15.00%

Volatility

FNGU vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 21.54%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.31%	21.54%	+5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.15%	42.61%	+7.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.43%	58.70%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.93%	67.57%	+12.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.93%	68.54%	+11.39%

FNGU vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.39%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and TNA in my portfolio?

FNGU and TNA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGU or TNA?

FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to TNA (21.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or TNA?

On 1-year performance, TNA leads with 117.40% vs 21.24% for FNGU. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.14% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 21.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGU or TNA?

Over the 1-year period, TNA has performed better with a 117.40% return vs 21.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or TNA?

TNA is cheaper with a 1.14% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or TNA?

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between FNGU and TNA?

FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 1.14% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.