FNGU vs. SPOG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGU is passively managed, while SPOG is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SPOG.

Performance

FNGU vs. SPOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 27.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPOG's -40.37% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -6.51%
• 1M: 22.14%
• YTD: 27.32%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 52.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPOG

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 33.09%
• YTD: -40.37%
• 6M: -36.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. SPOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	27.32%	-10.87%
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF	-40.37%	-19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and SPOG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. SPOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 25
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. SPOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGU	SPOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGU	SPOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	-0.72	+1.04

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. SPOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, smaller than the maximum SPOG drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and SPOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	SPOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.84%	-64.41%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.04%	-52.02%	+40.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-40.51%	+18.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	SPOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.86%	103.50%	-45.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.70%	103.50%	-24.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.70%	103.50%	-24.80%

FNGU vs. SPOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. SPOG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor SPOG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and SPOG in my portfolio?

FNGU and SPOG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or SPOG?

On fees, SPOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or SPOG?

SPOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or SPOG?

FNGU and SPOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGU and SPOG?

They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 0.75% for SPOG.