SPOG vs. METU
SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) and METU (Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for METU.
Performance
SPOG vs. METU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPOG having a -40.53% return and METU slightly higher at -39.77%.
SPOG
- 1D
- -8.23%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- 6M
- -18.07%
- YTD
- -40.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
METU
- 1D
- 6.66%
- 1M
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -47.62%
- YTD
- -39.77%
- 1Y
- -57.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $90.59M | $138.47M | $136.75M | |
| $166.22K | $181.03K | $420.26K |
SPOG vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | -40.53% | -18.73% |
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | -39.77% | 14.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG and METU is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
METU
SPOG vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPOG | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPOG vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, roughly equal to the maximum METU drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and METU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -63.90% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.15% | -61.50% | +9.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -25.76% | -17.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.50% | — |
Volatility
SPOG vs. METU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG | METU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.11% | 79.58% | +16.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.11% | 75.03% | +21.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.11% | 75.03% | +21.08% |
SPOG vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than METU's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG vs. METU - Dividend Comparison
SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METU Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF | 4.61% | 3.00% | 1.40% |
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG and METU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for METU.
METU has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 1.02% for METU.
Find the right allocation for SPOG and METU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer