PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPOG vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPOG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -38.29% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.


SPOG

1D
-3.30%
1M
23.93%
YTD
-38.29%
6M
-37.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
5.57%
1M
246.94%
YTD
907.48%
6M
1,268.17%
1Y
6,388.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPOG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF
-38.29%-19.53%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
907.48%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPOG and MULL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPOG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPOG

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPOG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPOG vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPOGMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

7.34

-8.05

Drawdowns

SPOG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPOGMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-72.29%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.34%

0.00%

-50.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.33%

-20.67%

-19.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

Volatility

SPOG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPOGMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

55.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.01%

132.53%

-28.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.01%

136.39%

-32.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.01%

136.39%

-32.38%

SPOG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPOG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPOG and MULL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 1.50% for MULL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPOG and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer