SPOG vs. MULL
SPOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SPOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
SPOG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPOG achieves a -38.29% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.
SPOG
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 23.93%
- YTD
- -38.29%
- 6M
- -37.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- 246.94%
- YTD
- 907.48%
- 6M
- 1,268.17%
- 1Y
- 6,388.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPOG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | -38.29% | -19.53% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 907.48% | 28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPOG and MULL is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPOG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
SPOG
MULL
SPOG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF (SPOG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPOG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 49.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 7.34 | -8.05 |
Drawdowns
SPOG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPOG drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPOG and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPOG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -72.29% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.34% | 0.00% | -50.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.33% | -20.67% | -19.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
SPOG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPOG | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 105.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.01% | 132.53% | -28.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.01% | 136.39% | -32.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.01% | 136.39% | -32.38% |
SPOG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPOG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
SPOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
SPOG Leverage Shares 2X Long SPOT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPOG and MULL have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for SPOG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SPOG and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for SPOG and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer