FNGU vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNGU charges 2.60%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

FNGU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 869.59% return.

FNGU

• 1D: -7.77%
• 1M: -5.74%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: 10.62%
• 1M: 28.51%
• YTD: 869.59%
• 6M: 899.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	7.21%	-6.89%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	869.59%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and LINT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.38

FNGU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGU	LINT
Technology	60.6%	100.0%
Communication Services	29.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 17
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	—	—

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-49.54%	-11.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.09%	0.00%	-25.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-20.53%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.41%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.11%	168.26%	-104.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.02%	168.26%	-87.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.02%	168.26%	-87.24%

FNGU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 2.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.

Position	TTM	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.09%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGU and LINT in my portfolio?

FNGU and LINT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNGU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGU or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between FNGU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 2.60% for FNGU and 0.97% for LINT.