FNGS vs. UAMY
FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index, while UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FNGS returned 19.76%/yr vs 49.67%/yr for UAMY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNGS vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 40.24% return.
FNGS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 29.80%
- 5Y*
- 19.76%
- 10Y*
- —
UAMY
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- -29.39%
- YTD
- 40.24%
- 6M
- 25.71%
- 1Y
- 133.11%
- 3Y*
- 174.60%
- 5Y*
- 49.67%
- 10Y*
- 39.91%
FNGS vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 6.79% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.10% |
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation | 40.24% | 183.62% | 610.84% | -48.86% | -2.19% | -4.64% | 35.58% | -15.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and UAMY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGS vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank
FNGS
UAMY
FNGS vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGS | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.80 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | 3.10 | -0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and UAMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGS | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -96.44% | +47.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -74.30% | +51.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.77% | -74.30% | +47.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | -80.46% | +31.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -59.70% | +50.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -66.41% | +55.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.05% | 43.23% | -35.18% |
Volatility
FNGS vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) is 8.74%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 30.55%. This indicates that FNGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGS | UAMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 30.55% | -21.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | 93.03% | -75.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 132.02% | -110.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 95.07% | -64.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.17% | 101.02% | -69.85% |
Dividends
FNGS vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGS nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGS and UAMY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAMY has higher volatility (30.55%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGS dropped -48.98% vs UAMY's -96.44%.
UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGS and UAMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer