FNGO vs. TPYP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGO returned 24.54%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FNGO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.

Performance

FNGO vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 22.76% return.

FNGO

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: 6.86%
• 6M: 26.78%
• YTD: 18.42%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 52.84%
• 5Y*: 24.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 38.55%

TPYP

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: 15.97%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 1Y: 24.58%
• 3Y*: 24.25%
• 5Y*: 19.56%
• 10Y*: 11.54%
• ALL TIME*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	$868.76K	$607.15K	$806.76K
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	$2.70M	$2.35M	$2.69M

FNGO vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	18.42%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	79.61%	-39.85%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	22.76%	7.59%	37.37%	10.51%	16.09%	34.97%	-20.99%	23.35%	-15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and TPYP is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018	0.23

The correlation between FNGO and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNGO vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGO	TPYP
Technology	59.6%	-
Communication Services	30.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	-
Financial Services	10.0%	2.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	69.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	21.2%

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 26
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 23

TPYP

TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 75
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNGO vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGO	TPYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.77	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	2.49	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	3.61	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	8.51	-6.89

FNGO vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and TPYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	TPYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-51.91%	-26.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-6.84%	-35.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	-13.17%	-34.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	-17.96%	-60.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.33%	-3.62%	-7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.75%	-7.83%	-15.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.56%	2.89%	+14.67%

Volatility

FNGO vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.42%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	TPYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	5.42%	+7.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.50%	11.28%	+25.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.91%	13.96%	+30.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.93%	17.40%	+43.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.48%	21.90%	+39.58%

FNGO vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGO vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	3.22%	3.91%	3.95%	4.83%	4.48%	4.86%	6.14%	4.45%	4.58%	3.71%	3.49%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGO and TPYP in my portfolio?

FNGO and TPYP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGO or TPYP?

FNGO has higher volatility (13.31%) compared to TPYP (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

Which ETF is better, FNGO or TPYP?

On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 24.54% vs 19.56% for TPYP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGO or TPYP?

Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 19.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGO or TPYP?

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGO or TPYP?

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.

What is the main difference between FNGO and TPYP?

FNGO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. FNGO tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 0.40% for TPYP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.