FNGO vs. COST

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FNGO returned 27.19%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for COST. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FNGO vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNGO having a 13.62% return and COST slightly lower at 13.35%.

FNGO

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: 33.20%
• 3Y*: 54.61%
• 5Y*: 27.19%
• 10Y*: —

COST

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -3.37%
• YTD: 13.35%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: -3.42%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 22.05%
• 10Y*: 22.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	13.62%	25.49%	101.65%	240.10%	-71.55%	28.38%	238.00%	79.61%	-40.52%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	13.35%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and COST is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018	0.39

The correlation between FNGO and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 32
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 28
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGO	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	-0.18	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	-0.13	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.98	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	-0.22	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.04	-0.51	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGO vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGO	COST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	-0.18	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.98	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.59	+0.04

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-53.39%	-25.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-15.38%	-27.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	-20.74%	-26.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	-31.40%	-46.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.93%	-10.93%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.89%	-13.36%	-10.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.28%	7.15%	+9.13%

Volatility

FNGO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a higher volatility of 17.22% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that FNGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.22%	7.71%	+9.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.93%	14.53%	+18.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.39%	18.79%	+22.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.45%	22.71%	+37.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.64%	21.95%	+39.69%

Dividends

FNGO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.55%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGO and COST in my portfolio?

FNGO and COST have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGO or COST?

FNGO has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.