FNGD vs. SPYG
FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%), while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNGD returned -65.09%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for SPYG. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
FNGD vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -37.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return.
FNGD
- 1D
- 7.27%
- 1M
- -21.28%
- YTD
- -37.59%
- 6M
- -28.81%
- 1Y
- -57.62%
- 3Y*
- -68.38%
- 5Y*
- -65.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
FNGD vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -37.59% | -61.42% | -76.57% | -90.14% | 52.21% | -60.04% | -95.60% | -72.46% | -13.73% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -6.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and SPYG is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018 | -0.86 |
The correlation between FNGD and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNGD vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGD
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FNGD
SPYG
Communication Services
FNGD
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
FNGD
SPYG
Financial Services
FNGD
SPYG
Basic Materials
FNGD
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
FNGD
-
SPYG
Energy
FNGD
-
SPYG
Healthcare
FNGD
-
SPYG
Industrials
FNGD
-
SPYG
Real Estate
FNGD
-
SPYG
Utilities
FNGD
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGD vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
FNGD
SPYG
FNGD vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.37 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 2.46 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | 10.17 | -11.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 2.11 | -3.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 | 0.76 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.35 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -67.63% | -32.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.92% | -13.76% | -52.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.37% | -22.14% | -75.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | -32.67% | -67.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -1.15% | -98.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.26% | -24.32% | -62.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.22% | 3.32% | +29.90% |
Volatility
FNGD vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 19.43% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.34%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGD | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | 4.34% | +15.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.44% | 12.46% | +33.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.15% | 16.06% | +43.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.80% | 21.16% | +67.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.02% | 20.64% | +70.38% |
FNGD vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGD vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGD and SPYG have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGD has higher volatility (19.43%) compared to SPYG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs -65.09% for FNGD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs -65.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGD.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.
FNGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGD and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer