PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGD vs. BERZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGD vs. BERZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGD vs. BERZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNGD
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
40.23%-61.42%-76.57%-90.14%52.21%-31.62%
BERZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
19.74%-78.81%-65.95%-89.12%102.85%-30.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than BERZ's 19.74% return.


FNGD

1D
-13.84%
1M
10.30%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.34%
1Y
-59.51%
3Y*
-65.85%
5Y*
-59.96%
10Y*

BERZ

1D
-14.87%
1M
7.73%
YTD
19.74%
6M
-4.91%
1Y
-79.02%
3Y*
-70.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGD vs. BERZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGD and BERZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

FNGD vs. BERZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD
FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BERZ
BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. BERZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGDBERZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.76

-0.84

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

-1.52

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.81

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.88

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.82

-1.00

+0.18

FNGD vs. BERZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is comparable to the BERZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and BERZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGDBERZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

-0.84

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

-0.66

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and BERZ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNGD vs. BERZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGD nor BERZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. BERZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BERZ drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and BERZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGDBERZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-99.46%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.53%

-89.01%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-99.28%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.98%

-70.50%

-16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.84%

78.74%

-6.90%

Volatility

FNGD vs. BERZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) is 24.51%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that FNGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BERZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGDBERZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

29.36%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

61.12%

-15.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.65%

94.14%

-15.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.85%

92.55%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.51%

92.55%

-1.04%