FNGD vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
FNGD and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGD is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both FNGD and FNGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNGD or FNGU.
Key characteristics
| FNGD | FNGU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -40.87% | 41.02% |
| 1Y Return | -78.79% | 192.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -64.20% | 7.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -75.86% | 49.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.13 | 2.88 |
| Daily Std Dev | 70.29% | 69.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.97% | -92.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.97% | -32.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and FNGU is -0.99. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
FNGD vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -40.87% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 41.02% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGD vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNGD and FNGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNGD vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNGD vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FNGD nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNGD vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) have volatilities of 23.63% and 23.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.