PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGD vs. FNGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGD vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGD vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNGD
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
40.23%-61.42%-76.57%-90.14%52.21%-60.04%-95.60%-72.46%56.52%
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-25.13%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%28.38%238.00%79.61%-40.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than FNGO's -25.13% return.


FNGD

1D
-13.84%
1M
10.30%
YTD
40.23%
6M
44.34%
1Y
-59.51%
3Y*
-65.85%
5Y*
-59.96%
10Y*

FNGO

1D
8.94%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-25.13%
6M
-30.39%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
51.07%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGD vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGD and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

FNGD vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD
FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGDFNGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.76

0.51

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.93

1.14

-2.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.15

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.62

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.82

1.78

-2.60

FNGD vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and FNGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGDFNGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

0.51

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

0.29

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.52

-1.27

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and FNGO is -0.96. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FNGD vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGD nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FNGO's maximum drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and FNGO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGDFNGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-78.39%

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.53%

-42.73%

-39.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

-78.39%

-21.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-37.61%

-62.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.98%

-24.16%

-62.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.84%

15.00%

+56.84%

Volatility

FNGD vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 24.51% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) at 15.84%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGDFNGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.51%

15.84%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.21%

30.38%

+14.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.65%

54.54%

+24.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.85%

60.28%

+28.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.51%

61.91%

+29.60%