FNGD vs. BNKD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%), while BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGD returned -60.64% vs -65.56% for BNKD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

FNGD vs. BNKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -41.82% return, which is significantly lower than BNKD's -19.99% return.

FNGD

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -28.48%
• YTD: -41.82%
• 6M: -33.35%
• 1Y: -60.64%
• 3Y*: -69.29%
• 5Y*: -65.57%
• 10Y*: —

BNKD

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -19.99%
• 6M: -30.69%
• 1Y: -65.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGD vs. BNKD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-41.82%	-54.09%
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-19.99%	-62.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and BNKD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.49

The correlation between FNGD and BNKD shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNGD vs. BNKD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGD	BNKD
Technology	59.9%	-
Communication Services	28.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	-
Financial Services	10.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGD vs. BNKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 1
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. BNKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGD	BNKD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.04	-1.15	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.75	-2.18	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	0.77	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.97	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.84	-1.33	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGD vs. BNKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is comparable to the BNKD Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and BNKD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGD	BNKD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.04	-1.15	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	-0.82	+0.04

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. BNKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BNKD's maximum drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and BNKD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGD	BNKD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-84.82%	-15.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.92%	-67.85%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-84.28%	-15.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.25%	-64.01%	-23.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.99%	49.30%	-16.31%

Volatility

FNGD vs. BNKD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 17.47% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) at 14.65%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGD	BNKD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.47%	14.65%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.91%	45.42%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.70%	57.40%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.78%	74.17%	+14.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.00%	74.17%	+16.83%

FNGD vs. BNKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGD and BNKD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

FNGD vs. BNKD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGD nor BNKD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGD and BNKD in my portfolio?

FNGD and BNKD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGD or BNKD?

FNGD has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to BNKD (14.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGD dropped -100.00% vs BNKD's -84.82%.

Which ETF is better, FNGD or BNKD?

On 1-year performance, FNGD leads with -60.64% vs -65.56% for BNKD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 14.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGD or BNKD?

Over the 1-year period, FNGD has performed better with a -60.64% return vs -65.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGD or BNKD?

FNGD and BNKD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGD or BNKD?

FNGD and BNKD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGD and BNKD?

FNGD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNKD is Inverse Equities. FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%), while BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and REX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.04 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.