FNGAX vs. FISZX
FNGAX (Franklin International Growth Fund Class A) and FISZX (Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FNGAX returned -4.20%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for FISZX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNGAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FISZX.
Performance
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 26.14% return.
FNGAX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -4.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
FISZX
- 1D
- -4.85%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 6M
- 27.24%
- 1Y
- 41.06%
- 3Y*
- 22.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -2.20% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 17.30% |
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 26.14% | 31.77% | 3.61% | 15.83% | -28.32% | 9.91% | 23.49% | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGAX and FISZX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FNGAX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGAX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank
FNGAX
FISZX
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGAX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.37 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.96 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 11.42 | -11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and FISZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGAX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -39.92% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -14.48% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -14.63% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.24% | -39.92% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.78% | -4.85% | -17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -12.29% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 3.73% | +2.53% |
Volatility
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) is 6.39%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that FNGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGAX | FISZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 11.61% | -5.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 19.24% | -4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 21.46% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 18.43% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 18.61% | +1.59% |
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGAX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison
FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FISZX's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISZX Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund | 1.53% | 1.92% | 2.55% | 1.89% | 1.37% | 6.08% | 0.90% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.34% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGAX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISZX has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to FNGAX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGAX dropped -53.35% vs FISZX's -39.92%.
FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGAX and FISZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer