PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISZX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISZX achieves a 31.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 10.54% return.


FISZX

1D
2.96%
1M
8.91%
YTD
31.45%
6M
33.58%
1Y
49.39%
3Y*
22.96%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*

FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
31.45%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FISZX and FSPSX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FISZX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISZX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISZXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.15

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

8.05

+5.06

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISZX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISZX drawdown since its inception was -39.92%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISZX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISZXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.92%

-33.69%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.48%

-11.39%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-13.58%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.92%

-29.41%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-6.53%

-5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

3.04%

+0.68%

Volatility

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.93%. This indicates that FISZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISZXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

4.93%

+5.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.55%

12.71%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

15.26%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

16.07%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

16.56%

+1.97%

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FISZX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FISZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FSPSX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.46%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISZX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISZX dropped -39.92% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISZX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer