FNGAX vs. FHLFX
FNGAX (Franklin International Growth Fund Class A) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FNGAX returned -4.20%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNGAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGAX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 8.47% return.
FNGAX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -4.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
FHLFX
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | -2.20% | 10.48% | 0.37% | 15.00% | -32.05% | 1.17% | 32.56% | 36.91% | -19.90% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 8.47% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGAX and FHLFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FNGAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
FNGAX
FHLFX
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.26 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 1.95 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 7.30 | -7.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGAX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.35% | -33.58% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -11.37% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.26% | -13.62% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.24% | -29.36% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.78% | -2.03% | -20.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -6.07% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.26% | 3.04% | +3.22% |
Volatility
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Growth Fund Class A (FNGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 5.20%. This indicates that FNGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 5.20% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 12.87% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 15.39% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 16.09% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 17.66% | +2.54% |
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
FNGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than FHLFX's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.19% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNGAX Franklin International Growth Fund Class A | 3.34% | 3.36% | 1.86% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 1.80% | 2.22% | 0.13% | 1.94% | 1.31% | 0.53% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGAX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGAX has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to FHLFX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGAX dropped -53.35% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGAX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer