PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLFX vs. SCIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than SCIEX's 9.90% return.


FHLFX

1D
2.59%
1M
1.98%
6M
7.18%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.44%

SCIEX

1D
2.19%
1M
1.67%
6M
7.12%
YTD
9.90%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
12.57%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%
SCIEX
Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I
9.90%25.98%5.89%17.02%-18.76%11.38%24.91%25.18%-11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and SCIEX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FHLFX and SCIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. SCIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SCIEX
SCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHLFXSCIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.57

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

5.61

+2.71

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the SCIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and SCIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum SCIEX drawdown of -60.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and SCIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLFXSCIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-60.26%

+26.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-12.23%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-13.63%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-33.07%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-12.30%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.42%

-0.42%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I (SCIEX) at 4.20%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLFXSCIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.20%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

13.67%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

16.14%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.77%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

16.94%

+0.68%

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SCIEX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLFX vs. SCIEX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than SCIEX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.07%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCIEX
Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I
2.49%2.74%0.00%1.27%1.37%1.95%0.32%1.22%8.64%1.18%1.77%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHLFX and SCIEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to SCIEX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs SCIEX's -60.26%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLFX and SCIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer