PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNF vs. TMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNF vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNF achieves a -14.75% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 8.58% return.


FNF

1D
1.34%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
-14.75%
6M
-16.57%
1Y
-8.42%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
10.75%

TMFC

1D
0.13%
1M
4.03%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.09%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNF vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
-14.75%4.35%14.02%42.18%-21.64%38.04%-10.34%48.75%-18.93%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
8.58%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%42.00%34.70%-5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FNF and TMFC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.38

The correlation between FNF and TMFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNF vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNF
FNF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNF Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNF Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNF vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNFTMFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.33

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

2.04

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.90

7.60

-8.50

FNF vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNF Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNF and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNFTMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

1.91

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.79

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.83

-0.57

Drawdowns

FNF vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNF drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNF and TMFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNFTMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.49%

-33.06%

-39.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-12.64%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.06%

-20.06%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.69%

-33.06%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.58%

-0.98%

-24.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.12%

-6.77%

-10.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.37%

3.39%

+5.98%

Volatility

FNF vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 3.18%. This indicates that FNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNFTMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

3.18%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.40%

10.11%

+9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

13.52%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.07%

20.36%

+5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

21.99%

+6.12%

Dividends

FNF vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

FNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than TMFC's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
4.35%3.60%3.46%3.59%4.57%2.99%3.45%2.78%3.82%37.01%2.59%2.31%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.13%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNF and TMFC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNF has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to TMFC (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNF dropped -72.49% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNF and TMFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer