FNF vs. FDVV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV).

FDVV is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016.

Performance

FNF vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNF vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNF Fidelity National Financial, Inc.	-14.11%	4.35%	14.02%	42.18%	-21.64%	38.04%	-10.34%	48.75%	-17.22%	65.53%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	-1.78%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNF achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's -1.78% return.

FNF

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -11.33%
• YTD: -14.11%
• 6M: -18.88%
• 1Y: -23.28%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 11.36%

FDVV

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -5.66%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: 16.89%
• 5Y*: 12.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FNF vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNF

FNF Risk / Return Rank: 11
FNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
FNF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 60
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNF vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNF	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	0.97	-1.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.00	1.41	-2.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.23	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	1.29	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.61	5.68	-7.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNF vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNF Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNF and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNF	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.82	0.97	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.86	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.74	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between FNF and FDVV is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FNF vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FDVV's 3.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNF Fidelity National Financial, Inc.	4.32%	3.60%	3.46%	3.59%	4.57%	2.99%	3.45%	2.78%	3.82%	37.01%	2.59%	2.31%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	3.00%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FNF vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNF drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNF and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNF	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.49%	-40.25%	-32.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.06%	-12.34%	-17.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.69%	-20.18%	-16.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.02%	-7.04%	-17.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.09%	-3.85%	-13.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.16%	2.81%	+11.35%

Volatility

FNF vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 4.48%. This indicates that FNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNF	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	4.48%	+5.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.53%	7.68%	+11.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.52%	15.34%	+13.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.91%	14.74%	+11.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.05%	17.09%	+10.96%