FNDF vs. SCHY
FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) and SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index, while SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDF returned 13.35%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for SCHY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHY.
Performance
FNDF vs. SCHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 21.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHY's 7.94% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 44.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
SCHY
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 22.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF vs. SCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 21.21% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 1.71% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 7.94% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and SCHY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FNDF and SCHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDF vs. SCHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDF
SCHY
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FNDF
SCHY
Industrials
FNDF
SCHY
Energy
FNDF
SCHY
Basic Materials
FNDF
SCHY
Technology
FNDF
SCHY
Consumer Cyclical
FNDF
SCHY
Consumer Defensive
FNDF
SCHY
Healthcare
FNDF
SCHY
Communication Services
FNDF
SCHY
Utilities
FNDF
SCHY
Real Estate
FNDF
SCHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. SCHY — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
SCHY
FNDF vs. SCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | 1.89 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.89 | 2.59 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.34 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 2.47 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | 7.90 | +8.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 1.89 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.60 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.66 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. SCHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than SCHY's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and SCHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -24.04% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -9.11% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -12.16% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -24.04% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -5.13% | +4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -4.97% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.84% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. SCHY - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) at 3.41%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | SCHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.41% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 9.79% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 11.90% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 13.25% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 13.23% | +4.44% |
FNDF vs. SCHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDF vs. SCHY - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than SCHY's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 2.84% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.44% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDF and SCHY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SCHY (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs SCHY's -24.04%.
On 5-year performance, FNDF leads with 13.35% vs 7.96% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SCHY has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.
SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.
FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHY is Dividend. FNDF tracks Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index, while SCHY tracks Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.08% for SCHY.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDF and SCHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer