FNDF vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNDF returned 13.97%/yr vs 16.89%/yr for QQQM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FNDF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 17.81% return.

FNDF

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 6M: 21.69%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: 22.12%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 12.05%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 17.81%
• 6M: 20.70%
• 1Y: 37.34%
• 3Y*: 26.07%
• 5Y*: 16.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	19.13%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	16.10%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.81%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and QQQM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.60

The correlation between FNDF and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDF	QQQM
Financial Services	16.2%	0.2%
Industrials	15.5%	2.6%
Technology	14.4%	58.7%
Basic Materials	11.3%	1.0%
Energy	10.9%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	6.4%
Healthcare	5.2%	3.7%
Communication Services	4.9%	14.3%
Utilities	3.5%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDF	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.16	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	2.82	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.38	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	3.14	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.95	11.66	+3.29

FNDF vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-35.04%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-11.96%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-22.70%	+8.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-35.04%	+9.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-3.14%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.63%	-8.21%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	3.21%	-0.38%

Volatility

FNDF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 6.43%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	8.16%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	14.03%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.01%	17.42%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	22.46%	-6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	22.26%	-4.56%

FNDF vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.89%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.43%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and QQQM in my portfolio?

FNDF and QQQM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDF or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to FNDF (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, FNDF or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.89% vs 13.97% for FNDF. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDF or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.89% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDF or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDF or QQQM?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between FNDF and QQQM?

FNDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.