FNDF vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, FNDF returned 35.15% vs 31.49% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

FNDF vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 16.98% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.32% return.

FNDF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: 12.91%
• YTD: 16.98%
• 1Y: 35.15%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

IFLO

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -0.87%
• 6M: 14.97%
• YTD: 18.32%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	16.98%	18.68%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.32%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and IFLO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.91

The correlation between FNDF and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDF	IFLO
Financial Services	16.2%	1.1%
Industrials	15.5%	18.1%
Technology	14.4%	21.5%
Basic Materials	11.3%	11.3%
Energy	10.9%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	2.8%
Healthcare	5.2%	11.7%
Communication Services	4.9%	6.7%
Utilities	3.5%	1.0%
Real Estate	0.8%	0.0%

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 87
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDF	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.16	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.13	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	4.91	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.84	16.50	-4.67

FNDF vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-6.44%	-33.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-6.44%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.14%	-2.22%	-1.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-1.29%	-6.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	1.91%	+1.07%

Volatility

FNDF vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 4.77%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	4.77%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.13%	12.05%	+2.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	14.71%	+1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.35%	14.61%	+1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	14.61%	+2.80%

FNDF vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDF vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	3.11%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.57%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and IFLO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FNDF and IFLO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDF or IFLO?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to IFLO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, FNDF or IFLO?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 35.15% vs 31.49% for IFLO. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDF or IFLO?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 35.15% return vs 31.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDF or IFLO?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDF or IFLO?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

What is the main difference between FNDF and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.56% for IFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.