FNDC vs. EEM

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDC returned 9.07%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for EEM. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.

Performance

FNDC vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 9.07%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.

FNDC

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 13.40%
• 1Y: 26.82%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

EEM

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 6.07%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 31.02%
• 1Y: 49.97%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 7.29%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	11.54%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	25.97%	33.98%	6.49%	8.95%	-20.56%	-3.63%	17.02%	18.22%	-15.31%	37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and EEM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.77

The correlation between FNDC and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	EEM
Industrials	25.3%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	8.3%
Financial Services	11.4%	17.7%
Basic Materials	11.3%	5.9%
Technology	10.1%	44.3%
Real Estate	6.6%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	2.5%
Healthcare	4.8%	2.5%
Communication Services	4.7%	6.0%
Energy	4.1%	3.4%
Utilities	2.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

EEM

EEM Risk / Return Rank: 77
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDC	EEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.30	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.97	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	3.71	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	13.67	-4.82

FNDC vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and EEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	EEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-66.43%	+23.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-13.52%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-17.29%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	-37.49%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-39.82%	-3.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-2.66%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-16.00%	+7.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	3.67%	-0.63%

Volatility

FNDC vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 5.27%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	EEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	10.76%	-5.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	19.65%	-7.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	21.84%	-7.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	19.33%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	20.67%	-3.84%

FNDC vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than EEM's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	1.62%	2.22%	2.43%	2.63%	2.50%	1.99%	1.45%	2.76%	2.24%	1.89%	1.89%	2.49%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.46%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and EEM in my portfolio?

FNDC and EEM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDC or EEM?

EEM has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to FNDC (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs EEM's -66.43%.

Which ETF is better, FNDC or EEM?

On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.97% vs 9.07% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDC or EEM?

Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDC or EEM?

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDC or EEM?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 1.62% for EEM.

What is the main difference between FNDC and EEM?

FNDC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.72% for EEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.