PortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. EEMS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and EEMS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EEM vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEM:

0.52

EEMS:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

EEM:

0.94

EEMS:

0.28

Omega Ratio

EEM:

1.12

EEMS:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

EEM:

0.40

EEMS:

0.10

Martin Ratio

EEM:

1.79

EEMS:

0.30

Ulcer Index

EEM:

6.11%

EEMS:

6.84%

Daily Std Dev

EEM:

19.34%

EEMS:

16.96%

Max Drawdown

EEM:

-66.43%

EEMS:

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

EEM:

-12.99%

EEMS:

-4.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 2.89%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.10% annualized return.


EEM

YTD

9.90%

1M

10.08%

6M

7.51%

1Y

9.90%

5Y*

7.04%

10Y*

2.89%

EEMS

YTD

2.99%

1M

10.33%

6M

2.14%

1Y

2.25%

5Y*

14.24%

10Y*

4.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEM vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMS's 0.69% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEM vs. EEMS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEM is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEM is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEM is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEM is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEM is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEM is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMS is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMS is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMS is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEM vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and EEMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EEM vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than EEMS's 2.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.21%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%2.23%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.52%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%2.67%

Drawdowns

EEM vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than EEMS's maximum drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and EEMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EEM vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) is 4.41%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that EEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...