PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.13%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


EEM

1D
3.25%
1M
7.77%
YTD
30.06%
6M
32.46%
1Y
55.79%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
10.13%

VWO

1D
1.73%
1M
3.65%
YTD
13.17%
6M
14.56%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
30.06%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
13.17%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and VWO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.97

The correlation between EEM and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
VWO

Technology

46.4%
31.6%

Financial Services

17.8%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
8.7%

Industrials

5.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

5.7%
7.0%

Communication Services

5.6%
5.8%

Energy

3.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.1%

Healthcare

2.3%
3.4%

Utilities

1.8%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.8%

Technology

EEM
46.4%
VWO
31.6%

Financial Services

EEM
17.8%
VWO
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
7.2%
VWO
8.7%

Industrials

EEM
5.9%
VWO
6.8%

Basic Materials

EEM
5.7%
VWO
7.0%

Communication Services

EEM
5.6%
VWO
5.8%

Energy

EEM
3.0%
VWO
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.4%
VWO
3.1%

Healthcare

EEM
2.3%
VWO
3.4%

Utilities

EEM
1.8%
VWO
2.4%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
VWO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.69

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

9.48

+5.54

EEM vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-67.68%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-11.17%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-17.37%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.49%

-32.60%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-36.39%

-3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-15.79%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

3.16%

+0.51%

Volatility

EEM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.66%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.04%

6.66%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

14.29%

+5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

16.66%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.38%

17.52%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

19.24%

+1.45%

EEM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than VWO's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.57%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.28%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, EEM and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EEM has higher volatility (11.04%) compared to VWO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 10.13% vs 8.95% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.57% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.08% for VWO.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer