EEM vs. VWO
EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEM returned 10.13%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for VWO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
EEM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.13%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.
EEM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 32.46%
- 1Y
- 55.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
VWO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
EEM vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 30.06% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 13.17% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEM and VWO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EEM and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEM vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEM
VWO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EEM
VWO
Financial Services
EEM
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
EEM
VWO
Industrials
EEM
VWO
Basic Materials
EEM
VWO
Communication Services
EEM
VWO
Energy
EEM
VWO
Consumer Defensive
EEM
VWO
Healthcare
EEM
VWO
Utilities
EEM
VWO
Real Estate
EEM
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEM vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
EEM
VWO
EEM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEM | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 2.69 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 9.48 | +5.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, roughly equal to the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEM | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -67.68% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -11.17% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | -17.37% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.49% | -32.60% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | -36.39% | -3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.57% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -15.79% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.16% | +0.51% |
Volatility
EEM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.66%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEM | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 6.66% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.85% | 14.29% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.01% | 16.66% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 17.52% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 19.24% | +1.45% |
EEM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than VWO's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.57% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.28% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EEM and VWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EEM has higher volatility (11.04%) compared to VWO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 10.13% vs 8.95% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.57% for EEM.
EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.08% for VWO.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEM and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer