FNDB vs. VLUE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) and VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDB tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index while VLUE tracks the MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDB returned 14.04%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for VLUE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.

Performance

FNDB vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDB has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 14.04%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.

FNDB

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 14.63%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 14.04%

VLUE

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 21.03%
• YTD: 49.63%
• 6M: 53.55%
• 1Y: 94.60%
• 3Y*: 34.45%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: 15.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDB vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.63%	16.23%	16.25%	18.42%	-7.53%	31.55%	9.40%	28.88%	-8.20%	16.94%
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	49.63%	32.67%	7.25%	14.26%	-14.17%	28.93%	-0.23%	27.20%	-11.13%	21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and VLUE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.92

The correlation between FNDB and VLUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDB vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDB	VLUE
Technology	18.8%	44.5%
Financial Services	14.1%	10.4%
Healthcare	11.6%	8.5%
Industrials	10.0%	7.4%
Energy	10.0%	3.2%
Communication Services	9.7%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	4.0%
Basic Materials	3.8%	1.6%
Utilities	3.1%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FNDB vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VLUE

VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 97
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDB vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDB	VLUE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	5.50	-2.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	7.03	-2.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.93	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	10.48	-5.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.48	47.09	-26.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDB vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 5.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDB	VLUE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.11	5.50	-2.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.94	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.78	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.76	+0.02

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and VLUE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDB	VLUE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.17%	-39.47%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-9.04%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-17.89%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.29%	-27.12%	+7.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.17%	-39.47%	+1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.66%	-6.01%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	2.01%	-0.38%

Volatility

FNDB vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 2.51%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDB	VLUE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.51%	7.99%	-5.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	13.96%	-6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.72%	17.28%	-6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	17.78%	-2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.48%	19.82%	-2.34%

FNDB vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDB vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than VLUE's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF	1.39%	2.11%	2.73%	2.66%	3.18%	2.22%	2.42%	2.61%	2.70%	2.14%	2.07%	2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDB and VLUE in my portfolio?

FNDB and VLUE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDB or VLUE?

VLUE has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to FNDB (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

Which ETF is better, FNDB or VLUE?

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.48% vs 14.04% for FNDB. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDB or VLUE?

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.48% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDB or VLUE?

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDB or VLUE?

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.39% for VLUE.

What is the main difference between FNDB and VLUE?

FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.15% for VLUE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.50 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.