PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDB vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDB vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDB achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDB having a 14.03% annualized return and DGRO not far behind at 13.44%.


FNDB

1D
0.10%
1M
1.21%
6M
12.62%
YTD
17.51%
1Y
32.18%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
14.03%
ALL TIME*
12.99%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.59%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.44%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$103.52M$104.25M$110.17M
$5.69M$5.14M$4.73M

FNDB vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
17.51%16.23%16.25%18.42%-7.53%31.55%9.40%28.88%-8.20%16.94%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.39%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDB and DGRO is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.93

The correlation between FNDB and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDB vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDB
DGRO

Technology

19.6%
17.3%

Financial Services

14.8%
20.4%

Healthcare

12.7%
17.9%

Industrials

10.3%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.5%

Communication Services

8.4%
0.1%

Energy

8.3%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
11.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
2.5%

Utilities

3.2%
7.3%

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

FNDB
19.6%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

FNDB
14.8%
DGRO
20.4%

Healthcare

FNDB
12.7%
DGRO
17.9%

Industrials

FNDB
10.3%
DGRO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDB
9.6%
DGRO
6.5%

Communication Services

FNDB
8.4%
DGRO
0.1%

Energy

FNDB
8.3%
DGRO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNDB
7.2%
DGRO
11.9%

Basic Materials

FNDB
3.4%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

FNDB
3.2%
DGRO
7.3%

Real Estate

FNDB
2.5%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDB vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDB vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDBDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.45

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

3.61

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.07

14.07

+5.01

FNDB vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDB Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDB and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDB vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDB drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDB and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDBDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.17%

-35.10%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-6.47%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-14.03%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

-19.31%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

-35.10%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.35%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-3.41%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.66%

-0.06%

Volatility

FNDB vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) is 2.32%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that FNDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDBDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

3.21%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

7.12%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

9.61%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

13.79%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

16.58%

+0.84%

FNDB vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNDB vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.43%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDB and DGRO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FNDB (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDB dropped -38.17% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, FNDB leads with 14.03% vs 13.44% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.43% for FNDB.

FNDB is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDB and 0.08% for DGRO.

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDB and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer