FNDA vs. SMMD
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD).
FNDA and SMMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. SMMD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. Both FNDA and SMMD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FNDA vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDA vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 3.11% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 10.35% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 2.10% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than SMMD's 2.10% return.
FNDA
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
SMMD
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 4.19%
- 1Y
- 23.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDA vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
SMMD
FNDA vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDA | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.62 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.67 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.33 | 7.05 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDA | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.42 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and SMMD is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDA vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, which matches SMMD's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.22% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than SMMD's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and SMMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -41.06% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.42% | -14.02% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -28.26% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -6.47% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -8.52% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.32% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 6.37%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.37% | 7.30% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 13.19% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.04% | 22.05% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 20.80% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 22.46% | -0.10% |