FNDA vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 10.87%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FNDA vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNDA having a 14.87% return and FNDX slightly lower at 14.57%. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

FNDA

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 14.27%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

FNDX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 14.57%
• 6M: 14.58%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.87%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.57%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and FNDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.90

The correlation between FNDA and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDA vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDA	FNDX
Industrials	18.9%	9.3%
Technology	14.9%	19.1%
Financial Services	14.6%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	9.2%
Real Estate	9.9%	1.8%
Healthcare	6.8%	12.0%
Energy	6.2%	10.3%
Basic Materials	5.2%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	7.4%
Communication Services	4.1%	10.1%
Utilities	2.8%	3.2%

Return for Risk

FNDA vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDA	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	3.18	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	4.47	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.59	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	5.35	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	20.97	-10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDA vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDA	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	3.18	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.85	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.82	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.79	-0.30

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDA	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.64%	-37.72%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-6.06%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.92%	-16.30%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.92%	-19.06%	-6.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.64%	-37.72%	-6.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.13%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-3.55%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	1.55%	+1.34%

Volatility

FNDA vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.25%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDA	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	2.25%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	7.25%	+4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	10.22%	+6.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.89%	15.18%	+5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	17.50%	+4.87%

FNDA vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNDA and FNDX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDA vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDA and FNDX in my portfolio?

FNDA and FNDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDA or FNDX?

FNDA has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which ETF is better, FNDA or FNDX?

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.26% vs 10.87% for FNDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDA or FNDX?

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDA or FNDX?

FNDA and FNDX have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDA or FNDX?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

What is the main difference between FNDA and FNDX?

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.