FN vs. VRT
FN (Fabrinet) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, FN returned 35.73%/yr vs 53.98%/yr for VRT. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FN vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 49.17% return.
FN
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -20.43%
- 6M
- -11.04%
- YTD
- -4.36%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 52.15%
- 5Y*
- 35.73%
- 10Y*
- 28.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 25.71%
VRT
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -22.43%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- YTD
- 49.17%
- 1Y
- 66.09%
- 3Y*
- 109.07%
- 5Y*
- 53.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | $369.31M | $374.33M | $584.37M |
| $1.93B | $1.68B | $1.97B |
FN vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | -4.36% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 32.96% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 49.17% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FN and VRT is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between FN and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FN:
$15.60B
VRT:
$93.00B
FN:
$11.64
VRT:
$4.42
FN:
37.40
VRT:
54.63
FN:
1.60
VRT:
0.24
FN:
3.72
VRT:
8.24
FN:
6.84
VRT:
19.94
FN:
$4.24B
VRT:
$11.48B
FN:
$509.75M
VRT:
$4.31B
FN:
$422.55M
VRT:
$2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FN vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
FN
VRT
FN vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FN | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 1.63 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 5.58 | -3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FN vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FN | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.46% | -71.24% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.47% | -40.70% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.47% | -61.28% | +16.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.47% | -71.24% | +26.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.67% | -35.78% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -16.29% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 12.00% | +2.68% |
Volatility
FN vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fabrinet (FN) is 20.97%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 24.48%. This indicates that FN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FN | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.97% | 24.48% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.26% | 52.93% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.07% | 64.52% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.89% | 63.43% | -8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.81% | 55.31% | -6.50% |
Dividends
FN vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
FN vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FN vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 637.90M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 497.80M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FN and VRT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to FN (20.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FN and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer