VRT vs. CLS
VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 67.87%/yr vs 117.18%/yr for CLS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRT vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 121.05% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 27.48% return.
VRT
- 1D
- 7.48%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 121.05%
- 6M
- 115.41%
- 1Y
- 202.31%
- 3Y*
- 147.70%
- 5Y*
- 67.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 27.48%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 178.67%
- 3Y*
- 198.00%
- 5Y*
- 117.18%
- 10Y*
- 44.15%
VRT vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 121.05% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 27.48% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -25.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRT and CLS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between VRT and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VRT:
$140.37B
CLS:
$43.60B
VRT:
$3.99
CLS:
$8.28
VRT:
89.81
CLS:
45.49
VRT:
0.39
CLS:
0.61
VRT:
12.91
CLS:
3.16
VRT:
33.07
CLS:
20.78
VRT:
$10.84B
CLS:
$13.81B
VRT:
$3.92B
CLS:
$1.60B
VRT:
$2.35B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRT vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
VRT
CLS
VRT vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.35 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.04 | 6.15 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.32 | 14.62 | +6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRT vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -96.93% | +25.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.32% | -29.24% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -53.96% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.24% | -53.96% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -20.23% | +15.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.22% | -73.28% | +57.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 12.28% | -2.75% |
Volatility
VRT vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) is 17.12%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.96%. This indicates that VRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRT | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.12% | 26.96% | -9.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.12% | 53.59% | -8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.08% | 72.82% | -13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.12% | 57.76% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.70% | 50.03% | +4.67% |
Dividends
VRT vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Financials
VRT vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VRT vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VRT and CLS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.96%) compared to VRT (17.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs CLS's -96.93%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRT and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer