VRT vs. CLS

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a -26.14% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -0.17% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 34.29% and 32.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.