PortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and CLS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

VRT vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VRT:

0.13

CLS:

1.55

Sortino Ratio

VRT:

0.64

CLS:

2.18

Omega Ratio

VRT:

1.09

CLS:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

VRT:

0.12

CLS:

2.52

Martin Ratio

VRT:

0.28

CLS:

6.28

Ulcer Index

VRT:

26.87%

CLS:

21.66%

Daily Std Dev

VRT:

73.87%

CLS:

75.66%

Max Drawdown

VRT:

-71.24%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

VRT:

-30.88%

CLS:

-21.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRT:

$40.16B

CLS:

$13.09B

EPS

VRT:

$1.72

CLS:

$3.52

PE Ratio

VRT:

61.27

CLS:

31.67

PEG Ratio

VRT:

0.84

CLS:

19.42

PS Ratio

VRT:

4.78

CLS:

1.30

PB Ratio

VRT:

15.06

CLS:

8.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRT:

$8.41B

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRT:

$3.05B

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRT:

$1.46B

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 22.70% return.


VRT

YTD

-6.62%

1M

48.00%

6M

-12.21%

1Y

9.13%

5Y*

56.36%

10Y*

N/A

CLS

YTD

22.70%

1M

40.58%

6M

37.81%

1Y

116.04%

5Y*

83.79%

10Y*

24.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VRT vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VRT is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VRT is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VRT is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VRT is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VRT is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VRT is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VRT vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

VRT vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.12%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VRT vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VRT vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 19.15% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 17.58%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VRT vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
2.04B
2.65B
(VRT) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRT vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Celestica Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
33.7%
10.3%
(VRT) Gross Margin
(CLS) Gross Margin
VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 686.50M and revenue of 2.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 290.70M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 164.50M and revenue of 2.04B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.