PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 49.17% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.


VRT

1D
6.18%
1M
-19.62%
6M
29.81%
YTD
49.17%
1Y
70.80%
3Y*
109.07%
5Y*
53.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.54%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B
$1.93B$1.68B$1.97B

VRT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
49.17%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and VOO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.52

The correlation between VRT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.21

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

9.44

-3.86

VRT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-33.99%

-37.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.70%

-8.90%

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-18.69%

-42.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-24.52%

-46.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-1.38%

-34.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-3.67%

-12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

2.08%

+9.92%

Volatility

VRT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 24.48% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.48%

3.54%

+20.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.93%

10.10%

+42.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.52%

12.82%

+51.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.43%

16.93%

+46.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.31%

18.01%

+37.30%

Dividends

VRT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.09%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRT and VOO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer