FMQQ vs. USL
FMQQ (FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FMQQ is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FMQQ returned 1.86%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for USL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
FMQQ vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
FMQQ
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -20.54%
- 1Y
- -20.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
FMQQ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | -18.43% | 10.77% | 12.45% | 15.15% | -54.03% | -15.21% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMQQ and USL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between FMQQ and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FMQQ vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMQQ
USL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FMQQ
USL
-
Technology
FMQQ
USL
-
Communication Services
FMQQ
USL
-
Financial Services
FMQQ
USL
Utilities
FMQQ
USL
-
Real Estate
FMQQ
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
FMQQ
USL
-
Industrials
FMQQ
USL
-
Basic Materials
FMQQ
-
USL
-
Energy
FMQQ
-
USL
-
Healthcare
FMQQ
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMQQ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
FMQQ
USL
FMQQ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMQQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.34 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.47 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 7.02 | -8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMQQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | 2.04 | -3.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.01 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
FMQQ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMQQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.51% | -89.06% | +24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.82% | -16.76% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.82% | -23.33% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.91% | -38.16% | -17.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -61.46% | +12.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | 8.27% | +6.83% |
Volatility
FMQQ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 6.21%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMQQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 10.53% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 23.33% | -7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 28.54% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 30.08% | -5.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 32.35% | -7.53% |
FMQQ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMQQ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMQQ FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 0.75% | 0.61% | 0.45% | 0.11% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMQQ and USL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to FMQQ (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, USL leads with 18.42% vs 1.86% for FMQQ. On fees, FMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USL has performed better with a 18.42% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
FMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
FMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while USL is Oil & Gas. FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMQQ and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer