FMF vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
FMF and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FMF is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Aug 1, 2013. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015.
Performance
FMF vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMF vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.00% | 4.54% | 8.17% | -0.18% | 5.24% | 3.57% | 5.69% | -5.16% | -2.64% | 1.70% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | -12.12% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMF achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's -12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FMF has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 2.60%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
FMF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 15.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
CIBR
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -12.12%
- 6M
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMF vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMF vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FMF
CIBR
FMF vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 0.00 | +1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 0.17 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.02 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | -0.03 | +4.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | -0.07 | +9.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.00 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.63 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.51 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMF and CIBR is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FMF vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than CIBR's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 5.09% | 5.60% | 4.85% | 3.09% | 0.41% | 3.29% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.65% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
FMF vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMF drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMF and CIBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -33.89% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.47% | -21.96% | +18.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.98% | -33.89% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.89% | -33.89% | +17.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -19.50% | +18.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -8.66% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 8.02% | -6.31% |
Volatility
FMF vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) is 3.76%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMF | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 7.04% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.41% | 16.45% | -9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 24.46% | -14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 24.21% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 23.22% | -11.39% |