PortfoliosLab logo
FMF vs. KMLM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FMF and KMLM is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

FMF vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.63%
20.56%
FMF
KMLM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FMF:

-0.49

KMLM:

-1.33

Sortino Ratio

FMF:

-0.63

KMLM:

-1.78

Omega Ratio

FMF:

0.93

KMLM:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

FMF:

-0.41

KMLM:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

FMF:

-1.17

KMLM:

-1.58

Ulcer Index

FMF:

3.34%

KMLM:

9.07%

Daily Std Dev

FMF:

7.97%

KMLM:

10.82%

Max Drawdown

FMF:

-20.32%

KMLM:

-29.10%

Current Drawdown

FMF:

-8.53%

KMLM:

-29.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMF achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's -7.26% return.


FMF

YTD

-3.97%

1M

-1.54%

6M

0.29%

1Y

-4.28%

5Y*

3.26%

10Y*

0.27%

KMLM

YTD

-7.26%

1M

-4.89%

6M

-5.86%

1Y

-15.54%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMF vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FMF: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FMF: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for KMLM: current value is 0.90%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KMLM: 0.90%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMF vs. KMLM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMF is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMF is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMF is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMF is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMF is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMF is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMLM is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMLM is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMLM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FMF vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FMF, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FMF: -0.49
KMLM: -1.33
The chart of Sortino ratio for FMF, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FMF: -0.63
KMLM: -1.78
The chart of Omega ratio for FMF, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FMF: 0.93
KMLM: 0.80
The chart of Calmar ratio for FMF, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FMF: -0.41
KMLM: -0.49
The chart of Martin ratio for FMF, currently valued at -1.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FMF: -1.17
KMLM: -1.58

The current FMF Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of -1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMF and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.49
-1.33
FMF
KMLM

Dividends

FMF vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

FMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than KMLM's 0.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FMF
First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
4.84%4.84%3.09%0.41%3.29%0.02%1.05%1.56%0.82%0.00%0.00%2.43%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
0.88%0.82%0.00%8.12%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FMF vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMF drawdown since its inception was -20.32%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMF and KMLM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.53%
-29.10%
FMF
KMLM

Volatility

FMF vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 2.46%. This indicates that FMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.90%
2.46%
FMF
KMLM