PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYW vs. NU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLYW vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYW achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -30.70% return.


FLYW

1D
-3.61%
1M
-19.44%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
2.89%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
-24.08%
5Y*
-13.76%
10Y*

NU

1D
-3.09%
1M
-15.94%
YTD
-30.70%
6M
-30.20%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYW vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
-1.98%-31.33%-10.93%-5.39%-35.71%-4.90%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
-30.70%61.58%24.37%104.67%-56.61%-9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYW and NU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.44

The correlation between FLYW and NU shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLYW:

$1.78B

NU:

$56.96B

EPS

FLYW:

$99.12

NU:

$0.65

PE Ratio

FLYW:

0.14

NU:

17.87

PEG Ratio

FLYW:

0.00

NU:

0.27

PS Ratio

FLYW:

0.01

NU:

3.24

PB Ratio

FLYW:

0.00

NU:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLYW:

$188.60B

NU:

$17.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLYW:

$299.78M

NU:

$7.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLYW:

$11.02B

NU:

$4.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLYW vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYW
FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
NU Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYW vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLYWNUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

-0.12

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

-0.31

+3.39

FLYW vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYW Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the NU Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYW and NU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLYWNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-0.12

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

0.05

-0.34

Drawdowns

FLYW vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYW drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYW and NU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYWNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.40%

-72.07%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.16%

-38.17%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.98%

-39.58%

-36.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.28%

-38.17%

-36.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.05%

-29.77%

-26.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.49%

14.69%

-4.20%

Volatility

FLYW vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) have volatilities of 13.57% and 14.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLYWNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.57%

14.24%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.75%

28.87%

+7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.09%

39.10%

+7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.36%

58.43%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.35%

58.43%

-1.08%

Dividends

FLYW vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYW nor NU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FLYW vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flywire Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
188.11B
4.98B
(FLYW) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLYW vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flywire Corporation and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
40.2%
Portfolio components
FLYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.00B and revenue of 4.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.

FLYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported an operating income of 10.78B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 954.31M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

FLYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a net income of 12.52B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 872.06M and revenue of 4.98B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLYW and NU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NU has higher volatility (14.24%) compared to FLYW (13.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYW dropped -84.40% vs NU's -72.07%.

FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLYW and NU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer