PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSGS vs. BATRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSGS vs. BATRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and The Liberty Braves Group (BATRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSGS achieves a 47.23% return, which is significantly higher than BATRA's 23.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MSGS has outperformed BATRA with an annualized return of 16.70%, while BATRA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.96% annualized return.


MSGS

1D
-0.50%
1M
11.95%
YTD
47.23%
6M
70.36%
1Y
101.13%
3Y*
28.76%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
16.70%

BATRA

1D
-1.69%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
23.46%
6M
23.38%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSGS vs. BATRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
47.23%14.61%24.12%-0.82%10.47%-5.63%23.03%9.90%26.96%22.94%
BATRA
The Liberty Braves Group
23.46%4.14%-4.63%30.95%13.63%15.60%-16.12%18.89%13.11%7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MSGS and BATRA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.35

Fundamentals

EPS

MSGS:

-$0.07

BATRA:

$1.57

PS Ratio

MSGS:

8.52

BATRA:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSGS:

$1.08B

BATRA:

$1.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSGS:

$48.32M

BATRA:

$447.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSGS:

-$41.02M

BATRA:

$224.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSGS vs. BATRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSGS
MSGS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MSGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSGS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MSGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSGS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BATRA
BATRA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BATRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATRA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BATRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSGS vs. BATRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and The Liberty Braves Group (BATRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSGSBATRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.21

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.09

1.24

+8.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.05

2.16

+21.89

MSGS vs. BATRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSGS Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the BATRA Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSGS and BATRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSGSBATRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

1.11

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.64

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.34

+0.18

Drawdowns

MSGS vs. BATRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSGS drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum BATRA drawdown of -54.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSGS and BATRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSGSBATRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.57%

-54.17%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-16.63%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

-21.86%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.96%

-22.37%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.57%

-54.17%

+12.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-5.20%

+4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-10.69%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

9.56%

-5.34%

Volatility

MSGS vs. BATRA - Volatility Comparison

Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to The Liberty Braves Group (BATRA) at 5.05%. This indicates that MSGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BATRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSGSBATRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.21%

5.05%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.35%

13.75%

+9.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.52%

18.64%

+10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

22.35%

+3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

29.39%

+2.05%

Dividends

MSGS vs. BATRA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSGS nor BATRA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BATRA
The Liberty Braves Group
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.82%0.00%36.97%

Financials

MSGS vs. BATRA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. and The Liberty Braves Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
432.20M
711.00M
(MSGS) Total Revenue
(BATRA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSGS vs. BATRA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. and The Liberty Braves Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-28.1%
41.9%
Portfolio components
MSGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a gross profit of -121.61M and revenue of 432.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -28.1%.

BATRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Liberty Braves Group reported a gross profit of 298.00M and revenue of 711.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

MSGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported an operating income of 1.96M and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.5%.

BATRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Liberty Braves Group reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

MSGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. reported a net income of 555.00K and revenue of 432.20M, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

BATRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Liberty Braves Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSGS and BATRA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSGS has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to BATRA (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSGS dropped -41.57% vs BATRA's -54.17%.

MSGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSGS and BATRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer