MSGS vs. EQWL
Compare and contrast key facts about Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL).
EQWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 100 Equal Weighted. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
MSGS vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSGS vs. EQWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 23.21% | 14.61% | 24.12% | -0.82% | 10.47% | -5.63% | 23.03% | 9.90% | 26.96% | 22.94% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | -1.85% | 17.61% | 19.11% | 19.48% | -11.46% | 28.29% | 13.94% | 29.54% | -6.30% | 24.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSGS achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly higher than EQWL's -1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MSGS has outperformed EQWL with an annualized return of 14.84%, while EQWL has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.
MSGS
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 23.21%
- 6M
- 38.68%
- 1Y
- 60.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
EQWL
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSGS vs. EQWL — Risk / Return Rank
MSGS
EQWL
MSGS vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSGS | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 0.88 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 1.32 | +1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 1.21 | +4.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 5.55 | +8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSGS | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.88 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.74 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.81 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.56 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSGS and EQWL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MSGS vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison
MSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSGS Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.82% | 0.00% | 36.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQWL Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF | 1.70% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 2.04% | 2.23% | 1.27% | 2.01% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
MSGS vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSGS drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum EQWL drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSGS and EQWL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSGS | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.57% | -49.36% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -11.47% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.96% | -22.99% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.57% | -34.30% | -7.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -5.51% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -6.75% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.51% | +2.14% |
Volatility
MSGS vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 4.15%. This indicates that MSGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSGS | EQWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.15% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.64% | 7.86% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 16.12% | +14.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 14.98% | +10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.37% | 16.78% | +14.59% |