PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MSGS vs. EQWL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MSGS and EQWL is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MSGS vs. EQWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.24%
4.72%
MSGS
EQWL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MSGS:

1.03

EQWL:

1.75

Sortino Ratio

MSGS:

1.67

EQWL:

2.43

Omega Ratio

MSGS:

1.20

EQWL:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

MSGS:

0.97

EQWL:

3.01

Martin Ratio

MSGS:

5.21

EQWL:

9.42

Ulcer Index

MSGS:

3.71%

EQWL:

1.99%

Daily Std Dev

MSGS:

18.86%

EQWL:

10.73%

Max Drawdown

MSGS:

-41.57%

EQWL:

-49.36%

Current Drawdown

MSGS:

-9.50%

EQWL:

-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSGS achieves a -5.42% return, which is significantly lower than EQWL's -0.38% return.


MSGS

YTD

-5.42%

1M

-9.24%

6M

7.24%

1Y

19.55%

5Y*

0.56%

10Y*

N/A

EQWL

YTD

-0.38%

1M

-2.91%

6M

4.72%

1Y

18.74%

5Y*

12.47%

10Y*

12.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MSGS vs. EQWL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSGS is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSGS is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSGS is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSGS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSGS is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSGS is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EQWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQWL is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQWL is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MSGS vs. EQWL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) and Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSGS, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.031.75
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSGS, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.672.43
The chart of Omega ratio for MSGS, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.201.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSGS, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.973.01
The chart of Martin ratio for MSGS, currently valued at 5.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.005.219.42
MSGS
EQWL

The current MSGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the EQWL Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSGS and EQWL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.03
1.75
MSGS
EQWL

Dividends

MSGS vs. EQWL - Dividend Comparison

MSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQWL
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
1.87%1.86%1.97%2.12%1.65%2.01%2.04%2.23%1.27%2.01%2.03%1.74%

Drawdowns

MSGS vs. EQWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSGS drawdown since its inception was -41.57%, smaller than the maximum EQWL drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSGS and EQWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.50%
-4.98%
MSGS
EQWL

Volatility

MSGS vs. EQWL - Volatility Comparison

Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) at 3.89%. This indicates that MSGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.05%
3.89%
MSGS
EQWL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab