FLTR vs. IBIC
FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLTR returned 5.05% vs 4.02% for IBIC. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLTR charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
FLTR vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLTR having a 2.78% return and IBIC slightly lower at 2.67%.
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.49M | $34.31M | $28.87M | |
| $1.04M | $809.24K | $530.96K |
FLTR vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.78% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 1.73% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.67% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and IBIC is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
IBIC
FLTR vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.96 | 2.09 | +0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.18 | 15.07 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 95.52 | 51.54 | +43.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -0.90% | -16.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -0.27% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -0.10% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.08% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.18%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) has a volatility of 0.23%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.23% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.64% | 0.69% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79% | 0.89% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 1.54% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 1.54% | +3.46% |
FLTR vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTR has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTR vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.57% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and IBIC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIC has higher volatility (0.23%) compared to FLTR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, FLTR leads with 5.05% vs 4.02% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 5.05% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.57% for FLTR.
FLTR is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FLTR and 0.10% for IBIC.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 4.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer