FLTR vs. GOOG
FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index, while GOOG (Alphabet Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FLTR returned 3.52%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for GOOG. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FLTR vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTR achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTR has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 3.52%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
GOOG
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 85.45%
- 3Y*
- 39.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M | |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | $7.78B | $6.87B | $7.98B |
FLTR vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 13.80% | 65.42% | 35.62% | 58.83% | -38.67% | 65.17% | 31.03% | 29.10% | -1.03% | 35.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTR and GOOG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2014 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTR vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank
FLTR
GOOG
FLTR vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTR | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.96 | 1.46 | +1.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.15 | 4.14 | +12.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 95.31 | 11.53 | +83.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTR vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTR drawdown since its inception was -17.84%, smaller than the maximum GOOG drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR and GOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTR | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.84% | -44.60% | +26.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.31% | -20.75% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.93% | -29.35% | +27.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.06% | -44.60% | +41.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.84% | -44.60% | +26.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.57% | +10.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -8.93% | +8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 7.44% | -7.39% |
Volatility
FLTR vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is 0.17%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that FLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTR | GOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 13.08% | -12.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.65% | 24.59% | -23.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80% | 31.77% | -30.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.13% | 31.80% | -29.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 29.34% | -24.34% |
Dividends
FLTR vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison
FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.63% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
GOOG Alphabet Inc | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTR and GOOG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOG has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTR dropped -17.84% vs GOOG's -44.60%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTR and GOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer