PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSP vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSP vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.72% return.


FLSP

1D
0.04%
1M
1.15%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.45%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSP vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
1.26%15.56%11.75%3.14%0.44%11.44%-15.19%0.90%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.72%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and LVHD is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2019

0.10

FLSP vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLSP
LVHD

Technology

21.1%
5.9%

Financial Services

18.7%
8.6%

Industrials

14.8%
4.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
6.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
18.5%

Basic Materials

5.8%

-

Energy

4.7%
6.7%

Utilities

3.3%
25.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
15.0%

Technology

FLSP
21.1%
LVHD
5.9%

Financial Services

FLSP
18.7%
LVHD
8.6%

Industrials

FLSP
14.8%
LVHD
4.6%

Healthcare

FLSP
9.7%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLSP
8.0%
LVHD
6.8%

Communication Services

FLSP
6.5%
LVHD
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLSP
6.3%
LVHD
18.5%

Basic Materials

FLSP
5.8%
LVHD

-

Energy

FLSP
4.7%
LVHD
6.7%

Utilities

FLSP
3.3%
LVHD
25.5%

Real Estate

FLSP
1.2%
LVHD
15.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSP vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSPLVHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.01

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

1.51

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.17

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.56

+2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

3.98

+6.61

FLSP vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSPLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.01

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.56

-0.26

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-37.32%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-6.17%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.69%

-14.29%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

-16.75%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-4.84%

+2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-4.05%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.42%

-1.03%

Volatility

FLSP vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is 1.98%, while Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that FLSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

2.86%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.64%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.27%

9.52%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

12.87%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

15.50%

-1.97%

FLSP vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSP vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than LVHD's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.62%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSP and LVHD have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to FLSP (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, FLSP leads with 7.70% vs 6.06% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLSP has performed better with a 7.70% return vs 6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.62% for FLSP.

FLSP is categorized as Long-Short, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FLSP and 0.27% for LVHD.

FLSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSP and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer