PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSP vs. FNGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLSP vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLSP vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
1.08%15.56%11.75%3.14%0.44%11.44%-15.19%0.90%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
-12.40%18.64%51.99%95.24%-40.32%16.96%101.99%-0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -12.40% return.


FLSP

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
1.08%
6M
5.31%
1Y
13.76%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*

FNGS

1D
4.69%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-12.40%
6M
-14.82%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLSP vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLSP vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP
FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSPFNGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.73

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.26

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

0.84

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.40

2.59

+7.81

FLSP vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSPFNGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.73

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.53

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.90

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and FNGS is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLSP vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLSP
Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF
2.62%2.65%1.18%1.19%2.18%1.19%8.08%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and FNGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPFNGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-48.98%

+26.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-22.93%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

-48.98%

+39.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-19.32%

+17.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-11.02%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

7.43%

-5.97%

Volatility

FLSP vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is 3.54%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that FLSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLSPFNGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

8.31%

-4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

15.68%

-8.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

26.98%

-14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

29.97%

-16.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

31.34%

-17.67%