FLQS vs. LVHD
FLQS (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while LVHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQS returned 5.50%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for LVHD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLQS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FLQS vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLQS having a 7.28% return and LVHD slightly lower at 7.25%.
FLQS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
FLQS vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 7.28% | 5.04% | 8.34% | 21.28% | -16.88% | 26.58% | 10.51% | 18.34% | -5.86% | 7.41% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 7.25% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQS and LVHD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FLQS and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLQS vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQS
LVHD
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Technology
FLQS
LVHD
Industrials
FLQS
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
FLQS
LVHD
Financial Services
FLQS
LVHD
Healthcare
FLQS
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
FLQS
LVHD
Real Estate
FLQS
LVHD
Utilities
FLQS
LVHD
Energy
FLQS
LVHD
Basic Materials
FLQS
LVHD
-
Communication Services
FLQS
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQS vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FLQS
LVHD
FLQS vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLQS | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.77 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 4.49 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLQS | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.15 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.57 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
FLQS vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQS | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -37.32% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -6.17% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -14.29% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -16.75% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -4.37% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -4.05% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.43% | +0.62% |
Volatility
FLQS vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that FLQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQS | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 2.89% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 6.61% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 9.53% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 12.87% | +6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 15.50% | +6.18% |
FLQS vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLQS vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than LVHD's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQS Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.75% | 1.40% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.41% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.39% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQS and LVHD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLQS has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.16% vs 5.50% for FLQS. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.34% for FLQS.
FLQS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQS and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer