PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQS vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQS vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLQS having a 7.28% return and LVHD slightly lower at 7.25%.


FLQS

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.44%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.40%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQS vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
7.28%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
7.25%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and LVHD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.60

The correlation between FLQS and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLQS vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQS
LVHD

Technology

17.1%
5.9%

Industrials

16.3%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%
6.8%

Financial Services

12.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
18.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
15.0%

Utilities

5.8%
25.5%

Energy

4.6%
6.7%

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.9%
3.8%

Technology

FLQS
17.1%
LVHD
5.9%

Industrials

FLQS
16.3%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQS
15.6%
LVHD
6.8%

Financial Services

FLQS
12.6%
LVHD
8.6%

Healthcare

FLQS
9.6%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLQS
7.8%
LVHD
18.5%

Real Estate

FLQS
6.7%
LVHD
15.0%

Utilities

FLQS
5.8%
LVHD
25.5%

Energy

FLQS
4.6%
LVHD
6.7%

Basic Materials

FLQS
2.1%
LVHD

-

Communication Services

FLQS
1.9%
LVHD
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQS vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQS vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLQSLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.77

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

4.49

+0.60

FLQS vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLQSLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.15

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.48

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.57

-0.18

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQSLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-37.32%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-6.17%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.12%

-14.29%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-16.75%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-4.37%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.05%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.43%

+0.62%

Volatility

FLQS vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.89%. This indicates that FLQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQSLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.89%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.31%

6.61%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

9.53%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

12.87%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.68%

15.50%

+6.18%

FLQS vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLQS vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than LVHD's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.34%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%0.00%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.39%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLQS and LVHD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLQS has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to LVHD (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQS dropped -42.16% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.16% vs 5.50% for FLQS. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.34% for FLQS.

FLQS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLQS and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQS and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer