PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FLQS vs. CSB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLQS and CSB is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FLQS vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
63.40%
69.07%
FLQS
CSB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLQS:

-0.01

CSB:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

FLQS:

0.14

CSB:

0.47

Omega Ratio

FLQS:

1.02

CSB:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

FLQS:

-0.01

CSB:

0.21

Martin Ratio

FLQS:

-0.04

CSB:

0.72

Ulcer Index

FLQS:

7.16%

CSB:

6.26%

Daily Std Dev

FLQS:

21.57%

CSB:

20.43%

Max Drawdown

FLQS:

-42.16%

CSB:

-42.08%

Current Drawdown

FLQS:

-18.66%

CSB:

-17.25%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLQS having a -10.61% return and CSB slightly higher at -10.38%.


FLQS

YTD

-10.61%

1M

-6.13%

6M

-12.45%

1Y

-0.17%

5Y*

13.58%

10Y*

N/A

CSB

YTD

-10.38%

1M

-8.11%

6M

-10.82%

1Y

2.18%

5Y*

14.74%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLQS vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLQS and CSB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLQS: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FLQS: 0.35%
Expense ratio chart for CSB: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CSB: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLQS vs. CSB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLQS is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLQS is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLQS is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLQS is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLQS is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLQS is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSB is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSB is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSB is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSB is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSB is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSB is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLQS vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLQS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FLQS: -0.01
CSB: 0.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLQS, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FLQS: 0.14
CSB: 0.47
The chart of Omega ratio for FLQS, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FLQS: 1.02
CSB: 1.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLQS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FLQS: -0.01
CSB: 0.21
The chart of Martin ratio for FLQS, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FLQS: -0.04
CSB: 0.72

The current FLQS Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQS and CSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.01
0.22
FLQS
CSB

Dividends

FLQS vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

FLQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CSB's 3.59% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.61%1.30%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.04%0.00%0.00%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.59%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%2.76%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Drawdowns

FLQS vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQS drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQS and CSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-18.66%
-17.25%
FLQS
CSB

Volatility

FLQS vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) have volatilities of 12.13% and 12.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.13%
12.01%
FLQS
CSB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab