PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLNC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNC achieves a 37.26% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.34% return.


FLNC

1D
9.26%
1M
113.95%
YTD
37.26%
6M
16.32%
1Y
459.79%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
37.26%24.56%-33.42%39.07%-51.77%1.60%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNC and VOO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLNC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNC
FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLNCVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.33

3.23

+4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

15.03

-0.16

FLNC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNC Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNC and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLNCVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67

2.44

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.89

-0.94

Drawdowns

FLNC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNC drawdown since its inception was -90.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNC and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.40%

-33.99%

-56.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.30%

-8.90%

-54.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.40%

-18.69%

-69.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.81%

-0.32%

-27.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.83%

-3.69%

-50.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.11%

1.91%

+29.20%

Volatility

FLNC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a higher volatility of 62.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.78%. This indicates that FLNC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

62.76%

2.78%

+59.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.33%

8.90%

+84.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.25%

11.80%

+114.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.28%

16.81%

+81.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.28%

18.00%

+80.28%

Dividends

FLNC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FLNC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLNC
Fluence Energy, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLNC and VOO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLNC has higher volatility (62.76%) compared to VOO (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNC dropped -90.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

FLNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLNC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer