FLKR vs. XOP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 14.07%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for XOP. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.

Performance

FLKR vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 61.37% return, which is significantly higher than XOP's 41.76% return.

FLKR

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -15.74%
• 6M: 29.07%
• YTD: 61.37%
• 1Y: 117.49%
• 3Y*: 35.68%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.21%

XOP

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 15.38%
• 6M: 27.63%
• YTD: 41.76%
• 1Y: 41.65%
• 3Y*: 10.13%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 5.00%
• ALL TIME*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	$43.49M	$47.84M	$51.57M
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	$553.31M	$544.38M	$598.08M

FLKR vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	61.37%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	41.76%	-2.15%	-1.00%	3.56%	45.37%	66.74%	-36.40%	-9.44%	-28.10%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and XOP is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.30

The correlation between FLKR and XOP shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLKR vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	XOP
Technology	51.7%	0.6%
Industrials	16.2%	2.2%
Financial Services	12.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.3%
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	-
Energy	0.7%	95.1%
Utilities	0.4%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XOP

XOP Risk / Return Rank: 58
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLKR vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	XOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.47	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	1.96	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.24	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	2.26	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	5.48	+6.80

FLKR vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and XOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	XOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-90.27%	+40.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.17%	-18.50%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.17%	-34.98%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.97%	-34.98%	-12.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-82.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.42%	-33.74%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.96%	-42.56%	+20.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.61%	7.67%	+1.94%

Volatility

FLKR vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 21.39% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) at 8.28%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	XOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.39%	8.28%	+13.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.33%	22.52%	+27.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.42%	28.49%	+24.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.16%	33.53%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.79%	40.15%	-10.36%

FLKR vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than XOP's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.86%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	1.83%	2.62%	2.45%	2.63%	2.47%	1.61%	2.34%	1.47%	0.99%	0.76%	0.76%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and XOP in my portfolio?

FLKR and XOP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or XOP?

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to XOP (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs XOP's -90.27%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or XOP?

On 5-year performance, XOP leads with 19.29% vs 14.07% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or XOP?

Over the 5-year period, XOP has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or XOP?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or XOP?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.83% for XOP.

What is the main difference between FLKR and XOP?

FLKR is categorized as South Korea Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.35% for XOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.