FLKR vs. VLUE
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 17.78%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for VLUE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
FLKR vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than VLUE's 45.72% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 113.45%
- 1Y
- 185.66%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- —
VLUE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 45.72%
- 6M
- 46.53%
- 1Y
- 83.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
FLKR vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 98.10% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.72% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and VLUE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FLKR and VLUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLKR vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLKR
VLUE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FLKR
VLUE
Industrials
FLKR
VLUE
Financial Services
FLKR
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
FLKR
VLUE
Basic Materials
FLKR
VLUE
Healthcare
FLKR
VLUE
Communication Services
FLKR
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
FLKR
VLUE
Energy
FLKR
VLUE
Utilities
FLKR
VLUE
Real Estate
FLKR
-
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
VLUE
FLKR vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLKR | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.77 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.11 | 9.25 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.21 | 39.16 | -10.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -39.47% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.03% | -9.04% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -17.89% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.51% | -27.12% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.25% | -2.61% | -6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -6.01% | -16.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | 2.13% | +4.48% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) at 8.83%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.85% | 8.83% | +17.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.11% | 15.31% | +26.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.82% | 18.38% | +27.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 18.00% | +11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 19.91% | +8.46% |
FLKR vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLKR vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than VLUE's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.95% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and VLUE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to VLUE (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.78% vs 16.01% for VLUE. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VLUE has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.78% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.
FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 4.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer