FLKR vs. SLVP

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 19.64%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.

Performance

FLKR vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 112.26% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's 0.95% return.

FLKR

• 1D: 7.15%
• 1M: 17.17%
• YTD: 112.26%
• 6M: 128.12%
• 1Y: 212.42%
• 3Y*: 49.62%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: —

SLVP

• 1D: 6.68%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 93.96%
• 3Y*: 52.67%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 13.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	112.26%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	0.95%	202.84%	14.47%	-2.31%	-18.06%	-23.53%	56.45%	37.71%	-22.10%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and SLVP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.32

FLKR vs. SLVP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	SLVP
Technology	62.9%	-
Industrials	14.6%	-
Financial Services	7.5%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	-
Healthcare	2.4%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	99.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SLVP

SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 50
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	SLVP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.63	1.72	+2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	2.09	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.28	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.29	2.48	+6.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.27	6.54	+25.72

FLKR vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and SLVP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	SLVP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-80.47%	+30.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-38.06%	+15.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-38.06%	+11.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	-49.79%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-27.18%	+24.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.02%	-46.77%	+24.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	14.41%	-7.80%

Volatility

FLKR vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 26.71% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 20.77%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	SLVP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.71%	20.77%	+5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.52%	45.32%	-2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.33%	55.01%	-8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.77%	43.26%	-13.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.47%	42.48%	-14.01%

FLKR vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SLVP's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.82%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	2.17%	1.78%	1.05%	0.88%	0.63%	1.63%	2.39%	2.03%	1.28%	0.85%	2.32%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and SLVP in my portfolio?

FLKR and SLVP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or SLVP?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to SLVP (20.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs SLVP's -80.47%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or SLVP?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.64% vs 16.28% for SLVP. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SLVP has been the lower-risk option at 20.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or SLVP?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or SLVP?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or SLVP?

SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.82% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FLKR and SLVP?

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SLVP is Silver. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.39% for SLVP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.